There's a hole in the bucket... so fix it
Problem solving has become a way of life. Every day, people wake up and goto work, to solve problems. Quite simply, there is not much money in 'being'. Infact being is to most problem solvers the anthithesis of productivity. To countries who value productivity the most, like China for example, being is severely frowned upon - to say the least; going as far as to even ban the practice of Falun Gong. The reason, we can assume being that energy cultivated within is very scary to the world of cogs, conveyer belts and money printing machines which relies heavily on a world of people being completely vacuumed into the false perception that all energy comes from outside or the external. Or perhaps it is merely that the 'self' becomes the authoritive place from which one derives energy, rather than clocking in and out of a factory and answering to those who have ammased the most amount of debt receipts, excuse me, I mean money.
In the world today for the most part, everything one does must create a stimulus response or solve some sort of crisis or perform some sort of distraction. We must keep the machine running. What is it about this obsession? The artist must tantalise the imagination or evoke some sort of emotion and constantly attempt to do better and re-invent herself. The businessman or woman must aim to change circumstances or provide some sort of solution or help create more profits. The teacher must provide answers and grade his or her students. The boyfriend must engage the girlfriend. But to be still is almost nightmarish. Where has this paradigm of thought come from? Clearly it is a parasitical train of thought because batteries do indeed tend to run out and there appears to be only so much coal - so we are now looking at the root cause and give some attention to the underlying problem perhaps before we suck ourselves into oblivian. Who wants to suck earth into oblivian dry concrete metal jungle grid of mind numbing sickened darkness? Probably nobody, so lets continue...
Today, in any learning institute the emphasis is on the problem and solving the problem and while creative thinking exists, it is within certain guidelines and constraints. Yet how much time is given to silence? Consolidation? True boundless contemplation? In all my years of schooling of the 200 or so days of school per year just 1 minute per year was spent in silence. In my country, Australia, that 1 minute was spent to remember all the 'aussie battlers' who mindlessly followed the mandatory conscription to join the army and head over to Gallipoli and be slaughtered. Whatever country you are in, you probably had something similar. We are encouraged to take this minute of silence and be grateful for all the hard work these battlers did for us and the bravery in which they fought. Personally, I've never quite understood the whole thing. Don't get me wrong - I understand the fear that must have been running through the veins of these soldiers as their boats approached the shoreline and my heart goes out to them and the loss of their families, but I never quite understood how people could take guns and point them at people they don't even know and pull the trigger. I always saw those people as a generation of people who were so ignorant of the world at large that they believed whatever was written in newspapers and blindly killed 'the enemy'.
But back to my point, of the 200 days in school per year, 1 minute was in silence but that silence wasn't even silence - it was no speaking while thinking about war. Ironic? Or is that just a contradiction? Obviously we, or the authorities that be, those elite who hand down and pass on the curriculum we study understand the fortifying power of silence and yet the only time Australians really are expected to be in silence is for a minute or 2 to remember when some 600 - 700 soldiers were slaughtered. I don't think really many Australians know why we went to Gollipoli or how that campaign benefitted Australia much at all. What we seem to know as a collective nation is that we were supporting the Allies and that was a good thing because the 'Turks' were the enemy because they were sided with Hitler and Hitler was a bad guy because he killed people. Of course we weren't bad people even though we were killing people ourselves -- we were just killing people because they were killing people and so our murders were a response to their murders. Can you see the dysfunction in this cycle? Because the crazy thing is here, and this is by no means a defense for Hitler, but the Germans felt they were killing people because they were being killed. So there is this huge elaborate and almost ongoing tit-for-tat massacre taking place which goes all the way back to BC and beyond.
We just got roped into it, didn't we and its not our fault, it was a time of kill or be killed, of course. Or was it just a time of mindlessness? A time when people didn't really look underneath the surface. If the shiny TV printed "BAD GUY" across the face of the enemy that was enough because we trust big media. We trust our reactions. We trust group thinking. We trust our emotions. We trust our fears. We trust what the masses fall for. We trust our instincts or whatever is the first impulse that comes to mind and when it comes to war or fighting when your world is being threatened generally the response is run, or kill. In this sort of generic fear based response, there is basically nill time given to centering or attuning to what is really going on. Perhaps you are not threatened? Perhaps there is nothing to worry about?
Have you ever watched a pack of Lions in the wild? Perhaps on a documentary? Or what about just a little kitten when it is trying to catch a Lizard or an Insect? Have you noticed how the Cats completely lose interest when the Lizard doesn't fight back or the prey doesn't run? The predator wants a reaction, as though something is instinctually built into the hunter to drive fear into the prey. A psychologist will tell you that a bully doesn't choose its targets to pick on rationally, but by instinct. They wonder the school ground looking for those that are in fear and leave alone those that are unphased - generally.
I believe that if we could survey every school on the planet and every business not even 1% of time is prioritised to just 'being', and 'being' is sold as something that comes secondary to 'doing'. 'Doing' is the primary objective, and we arm children to be engineers and equip them with the ability to build new structures and the ability to create new medicines or conduct experiments and to compete with one another etc, while generally as a rule little to no effort is put into making sure that children are coming from a space of even wanting to benefit society. The head is given full access to concepts which can essentially destroy the world we inhabit while matters of the heart are completely ignored. When I talk with people on this topic of giving children ethical education it brings up alarm bells. "How dare you try and teach my child values??!" or "You have no right to tell my child what is right or wrong" and so the education system that exists is expected to provide all the tools to do more or less anything while not being allowed to impede on ethics or morals - it is only in later years of education that these things come into effect even though many psychologists will explain how a childs values are formed much earlier in life.
It could be said that schools do not do all that much in encouraging young adults to want to be of benefit society. The very fact that the system is based off competing with one another means that children are constantly in a state of alarm and survival. Quite simply, if you don't cut the grade - you will get in trouble. If you don't pass the test - you will be embarassed. If you don't get there on time - you will be punished. How do we expect to put children through decades of this arena of childish competition and expect them to take all of this higher learning in and magically come out the other side and want to help the people who have been oppressing them their whole life? Its rediculous, infact this can be proven that nobody wants to help society by this simple test.
Go around to every person you know and do a poll to find out how many people do as much as they can to pay as much tax as they can to government, then run a poll and find how many people try and do as much as they can to avoid paying tax. I rest my case. We live in a society where literally everybody tries to avoid offering anything back to the system from which has taught them and controls them. Doesn't that throw up alarm bells? You would struggle to find a single person on the planet who tries to pay as much as they can back into the system.
But, you're really not supposed to think about all of this too much. The idea is that there is always an exam coming up and that keeps you in the state of stress. Once you graduate from school, the exam changes and now the exam is rent, bills and tax. You have to question now - was school really about teaching you to be a good person who contributes to society, or was it simply training for the next 50 - 70 years of your life of being enslaved to the monetary based exam? After 10 - 12 years or so of being forced to come to school and be afraid of an authority who can make you feel shame in the school for being stupid or unqualified for the next grade, as you get older the equivalent becomes losing all your money or not making enough money and potentially living a life in poverty and on the streets. If you think about it, when you become an adult getting an A is being the elite, getting a B is being a millionaire, getting a C is being self employed or running a business or being a upper management, getting a D is working in a soulless job and getting an E is struggling to pay the bills and getting an F is being on the streets. Of course nobody translates that this reality to us - but through subtle insertions of values handed down through the Government controlled schooling system its not a hard value system to install on the sly - is it? Unfortunately, all of this backfires as we start to get all mashed together and the world gets smaller and there is less opportunity. In the dog eat dog world where one will do more for less ethics are questioned and with the right price a good man can be turned to an evil doer overnight. And this is where we come to teaching people how to fish and the unquestioning loyalty to this paradigm before even asking ourselves "why do we fish?" and no, because we are hungry is not the right answer. "Because we are hungry" has eventuated in the oceans being emptied so that we can have fish n chips served up whenever we want. "Because we are hungry" has eventuated in most of the beautiful coral reefs across the planet being ruined. "Because we are hungry" has eventuated in the Amazon rainforest being cleared to make way for livestock farms. "Because we are hungry" equates to people basically doing anything at the cost of survival and it has created a world where people literally destroy the planet and the possibility of a healthy future just to get through the current day. Its a reason which dominates - and its a reason which is killing us but its a reason that will get you an A.
So what good is it teaching a child engineering skills that is going to wind up creating a nuclear power plant which is one day going to blow up in Russia and mutate the nearby villages and regions for years to come and in time gradually infect the planet with radiation? Perhaps a different design or a design that came from somebody with different value systems may have been more effective and less likely to blow up - we will never know, but the mayhem created in Chernobyl is a very real scar in earths history and reminder for us to look at. I don't know the ins and outs of what happened at Chernobyl, infact I don't know anything about the design of the Nuclear power plant for that matter - but what I do know is that the intention behind Nuclear power is a reaction to a shortage of power which is a fear which is a state of mind coming from an innacurate and faulty perception of the universe. Nuclear power is bound to fail. See its this mindset which says "The power has run out, therefor there is a shortage of energy" and for most people this is as much logic as one needs to convince the masses that something needs to be done. "The coal has run out, so we need an alternative energy source" and that is all that is needed for billions of dollars to be invested into something else. But have you noticed that it has literally been the complete last resort to consider... to just consider... that just maybe humanity needs to do less? That the solution isn't a new energy... that its perhaps what we're doing just does not work? I'm not saying that a new energy system won't work - but what I'm saying is that considering doing less and achieving the same amount - if not more - that this is a last resort is definitely a strategy to our annhilation. That the engines must keep running at full capacity 100 percent of the time is completely stupid and bound to come grinding to a halt. That is for certain. Nothing keeps going in the same direction for this long other than the sun. And even the sun burns out eventually.
So what else is the result of the current failing paradigm? Well, that is not too hard to ascertain, it just requires we make some observations. Take a look around and what do you see? For our current world is a result of our past actions and our approach to life. I see crazy people. I see people fixing problems not even knowing why they fix the problems or what effects fixing those problems will have. I see people fixing problems that are not even problems. I see people fixing problems that would fix themselves. I see people adding things onto stuff that don't require it. And while every day more and more things are solved one can't help but wonder - are we really changing or progressing? Have we convinced ourselves in our hyper active culture that we are moving ahead at light speed when the dismal reality just might be - we aren't really changing at all?
Once you do start to slow down a little bit you start to notice the madness more. You will hear people talking about this problem and the next problem and before even finishing what they were talking about or arriving at any form of innovative conclusion they have quickly stampeded onto the next crisis to repeat the same cycle all over again. What this means is that most people don't ever really finish focusing on what they were focusing on and with every problem they string along kind of mental parasites which infect the next problem they are solving. What we now know about the way our brains work is that when we think a certain thing, we create neural pathways, like muscles. A train of thought which is used often equates to a part of the brain growing stronger and stronger and it becomes a muscle in a sense we rely on more to do the heavy lifting. In todays hyper active society, most people never give these muscles a rest and so they are using the same muscles over and over again but to solve completely different situations. For example, if you go find yourself a seat in a cafe like a Starbucks one day where there is lots of caffeinated conversations going on you can really glimpse into the madness at full throttle. I mean you don't even need to try and see if it exists because it is all around. You can hear people literally bouncing from one topic to the next. One moment a lady will be talking about how she has blisters from her new shoes. The next moment, without there being any conclusion of what to do, such as the obvious - taking the shoes off - she is mentioning her annoyances with her workplace - before arriving at any finally with that topic she is now breaching the topic of her boyfriend or partner and how he isn't talking enough or their sex life is slowing down - and without any silence in between any of these topic changes they quickly stand up and decide its time to go shopping and get some new dresses. For the next 2 - 5 hours, the ladies will browse different shops and continue talking about all of these issues in bite sizes. Each will take turns to devulge information about their issues and by the time they get home, their boyfriends are in for a surprise.
There is something severely disfunctional about fixing problems without having first seeing things from the bigger picture and the greater unfolding taking place. The universe is constantly changing on the surface. The earth changes. Water constantly flows. Seasons change. Infact it is believed that the only thing that doesn't change is that 'things change'. Change being the one and only constant. And yet, if you take a look around the world what we see everywhere is people attempting to stop this change or resist it.
This can be seen when we bulid dams to hold onto water so that a certain area can always have a non-stop water supply despite the seasonal shifts. This way we need not worry about whether it rains or not.
On coastlines and major tourist beaches around the world the oceans tides and waves will wash away sand changing the shape of the lands edge, yet councils will exhaust millions of dollars to bring in sand dredging equipment and rebuild those beaches so that they remain iconic and as they were.
The earth starts to pull apart in earthquakes and cracks are formed in the surface and we go ahead and fill them with more dirt and rocks. Constantly attempting to defy this change. How long have we been doing this? Ever since we convinced ourselves we are no longer a part of nature is my guess. Man and woman have elevated themselves above nature and are no longer species of earth, but rulers of it and as David Suzuki says in his book The Sacred Balance we have done something no other creature has done before and considered ourselves a Super Species, above and beyond the laws of nature. Rather than change with the tides and move with the seasons we have picked our positions of choice and created artificial value systems that are disconnected from nature. And if nature dare challenge that, we fight it. We rally arms against the storms and the droughts and rather than listen to nature we attempt to dominate it even though most attempts are wasteful and costly, generally futile.
So what is the problem with all of this supremecy? What is the core issue with believing we are no longer a part of the changing world? Well, for starters with this mindset comes a huge serving of delusion and a pair of glasses which distorts our vision of the world. And with distorted vision, isn't the result not seeing things as they really are? So what happens when we're not seeing things as they really are - doesn't that imply we can't really create 'solutions' which fix the underlying issue rather we are focused by the distraction or the most superficial layer of the core of the problem. While there is truth in that if you have a bleeding wound putting a bandaid will probably stop the bleeding and start the healing process - but if underneath that wound is a parasite eating at the surface of the skin to make the wound in the first place the bandaid isn't going to do much in the long run. So is there any truth to what I am saying or is this purely theoretical nonsense? Well, if we were to look at the largest problem solving and largest money making industry on the planet perhaps we could see if this theory holds any evidential weight.
In the medical and drug industry, the most profitable and most relied on industry on planet earth as it stands today, they are in the business of fixing health issues. But more accurately they are in the business of fixing symptoms. Which sounds well and good, but what is a symptom? Lesions on the skin is a symptom. Coughing is a symptom. A sore throat is a symptom. Vomiting is a symptom. A runny nose is a symptom. You get the idea. Naturally, when one has a symptom, the aim of the game is to get rid of it so that one can be symptomless. Its common sense really. Yet this common sense comes with a fatal problem: it only fixes the symptom and little no effort is ever really put into what caused the symptom in the first place. See, to the average person out there, stuff just happens and that is life. People catch colds and having the flu now and then is just to be expected. Getting these symptoms was really just a matter of being in the wrong place at the wrong time, or perhaps it was just being born with the wrong genes that were susceptible to catching certain diseases or having certain deficiencies. So to the common person, when we catch something or fall sick with something we go out to the doctors and get the medicine that will fix the symptom and we kill the symptom and get back to work... which is great... if you're a soldier in a war where the whole current modern medicine model stems from. Soldier wounded. Fix it asap. Get him back on the field and it worked for the old world warriors.
Yet, what really caused the problem in the first place? And could there be more to it then just that we were in the wrong place at the wrong time or are misfortunate and have weak genes? Who cares, right? Because by now you have popped a few pills or had surgery and the problem has disappeared. Out of sight - out of mind the problem no longer exists. Or does it? Has the problem really been solved or did we just simply temporarily alleviate the discomfort?
Today, despite the dominant drug industry in place, an awareness which to the masses seemed to be lost for some time has started to creep its way back into the minds of the populous. Today, you find many 'alternative' healers who would argue strongly against simply having an operation or popping some pills and they can explain to you how underneath the symptoms are the real cause of those problems.
So what has this got to do with anything I am talking about? Quite simply, when a problem arises in the world that threatens our feeling of being superior to nature and the constant changes it immediately rings off alarm bells. It is a bit like being derailed off a train track. Just a moment ago, before the symptoms manifested -- whatever those symptoms they may be, medical, business, relationships etc -- we were perfectly fine living in our wonderland of delusion. Up until a moment ago, we were supreme rulers of the universe, on top of the world and in charge of everything. We were comfortable in our nice square blocks of land with our lawns at 5 cm length and all the dangerous fauna and flora were locked up in neat Zoo's or prisons or farms out of harms way. But now, all of that has come crushing down as the symptom or problem shows its head and we descend from our heavenly godlike positions in the clouds and are reminded of our imminent death. We are reminded of our pending doom from many things, perhaps an expensive bill that will make us broke arrived in the mail, or a system in the business stopped working like the cash register or perhaps an employee suddenly quits, or perhaps the girlfriend has started to cry and wants a change, or perhaps a new war ovearseas threatens our bank interest rates and petrol prices. It can be anything -- anything that reminds us we are not in complete control and then the disasterous thing happens: we panic. Almost nobody is immune to this panic and with it comes generally one thing: fear and reaction to quickly get into problem fixing mode.
A river widens because the earth has decided the tectonic plates need more breathing room. With it a bridge falls down and traffic into a certain precinct becomes literally impossible. The citizens cry fowl and it is all hands on deck. If that bridge is not fixed commerce to this part of the city could collapse and there will be potential economic ruit. Then it wouldn't just be the bridge that is broken, but the community. Immediately a plan is put into to action to replace the bridge. It is known and common knowledge that doing so means that one day, the new bridge being planned into action will probably fall as well creating bigger turmoils for the future generation - nevertheless, one must not look too far ahead and think of such things - afterall, this is a crisis and we must act now because people are worried.
A woman is showering and finds a lump in her breast. It feels strange and even hurts a little to pinch. She is worried and immediately schedules an appointment with the doctor tomorrow for a pap scan. As she presses her breast between those cold plates and as it pushes down she feels a tightness on the lump she has never felt before. A screaching pain, but she bottles up the pain -- afterall, the doctor must know what he is doing. A tear falls from her eyes. Little does she know that the body is doing everything it can to naturally stay alive and fight off cancers and things of the sort and so it has contained the damaged cells or toxic matter in a bubble like prison but now the cold clamps have squeezed it, infuriating it, potentially even squeezing some of that toxic matter out into the body further excaserbating the situation. As it turns out, the test results come back positive, meaning its bad, and straight away an appointment is made to remove the lump. An incision is made into the chest and the protected sad inside the breast is cut open and sucked out with a syringe. More toxic matter is now entering the blood stream and the womans health is worse than it was before the test. She is now put onto a prescription of other harmful toxins which will no doubt defeat the bodies natural defenses more so weakening her immune system more so making her even more susceptible to future problems.
Every day, there are warning signs that our reaction to the problems arising are not helping. Yet we defy this because we are in fear. We build the bridge and we get the operation even though we know that it is not the long term solution. Every day, people have cancers removed and little to no deeper research has been performed by the doctors to even see if there is something innately wrong wtih what the person puts into their bodies. It is ignorance masked as mastery at its finest. Yet it makes billions and trillions of dollars every year simply because the world has gone mad. People have become so disconnected with what is, or any form of genuine insight that we don't trust ourselves. If a person with a certificate or 2 on the wall says something is what we need to do - we do it. And if a whole bunch of people with 1 or 2 certificates on the wall come together and say something is so, then that makes it a permanent fixture of what is. We dare not challenge it because together they have a combined total of 100 million certificates and obviously with that many certificates it must be true. Whatever they say goes, right? Wrong.
When we are in a state of fear we are off center. We make rash decisions. In science when an animal experiences something that is shocking or overly stimulating the areas of brain we use change. Referred to as 'fight or flight' mode and it can be induced when we are in danger. The aim of this mechanism is simply to survive and it is controlled by the part of the brain that connects to the top of the spine. Some consider this part of the brain the reptillian brain because it works on a core level of predation or avoiding being a victim to predation much like a reptile thinks most of the time. When this part of the brain is in full effect, the other larger parts of our brain of logic and creative thought start to turn off and so when in a state of fear or anxiety quite simply our bodies stop sending as much energy or electricity to our creative parts. Physical pain receptors are turned down and we burn more energy and can endure more stuff. A sort of emergency mode, we are no longer thinking long term - but here and now - and not in a spiritual being sense - but in a survival react and live sense. This of course serves its purpose say when a tidal wave comes its not time to think too creatively or analyse the situation too much - the animal instinct kicks in and says "run to the top of a mountain or climb a huge tree". Yet what has happened is that this sort of mentality now permeates a much more advanced world where there is world wide vaccination plans and weapons that can destroy cities at the push of a button. Day in and day out woman go and have their breasts removed even though it defies all logic because this state of fear is so rampant that we ignore our own bodies instincts. And we know deep down that just building another bridge isn't going to solve the real situation here unless of course this bridge can some how change with the next massive tectonic plate shift. Yet we proceed. We proceed when we don't even know the damage we are causing in the future. No doubt, that bridge will collapse again at which point the part of the city will be larger and probably rely on that bridge even more so, creating even more drama at which point even more resources will be needed now to fix the problem. But we will build it anyways, because 100 guys with certificates on the wall said so, right? Correct.
Yet where is the certificate for checking in with the frequency from which people resonate in? Where is the degree in wholistic thought which verifies that people who come up with solutions are coming from a space of what is best for the collective? Or the planet? Or the water in the ocean? Or the tranquility of the birds? Where is the test to check which persons or people are coming from the least amount of fear? Because there are volumes and volumes of texts which most philosophical minds on the planet would agree with which suggest that coming from a state of fear and anxiety produces more fear and anxiety yet anybody trained in these areas are considered simple mystics and mostly irrelevant. They are a last resort you visit at a retreat. They are compensation for all your hard work. Yet in my opinion, in the increasingly challenging times these people will be the most valued members of society who will not be the last people advised, but the first.
Lets look at 9/11. What happened on 9/11 was frightening. A symbolic gesture of the headquarters of modern economical supremecy came crashing down. We saw people dying and our certainty toppled to the floor in a rubble. Immediately, the world descended into a state of fear and within months American citizens passed acts which would mean that rights to liberty would be waivered. Within months innocent civilians were taken to torture camps where they were experimented on with the aim of extracting information that would mean people woudn't have to suffer. So people suffered in order to avoid suffering. It is madness - is it not? Yet it took years for the fear to subside and for the more expanded parts of our brains to kick in again and realise the lunacy of how we had reacted. It took us years before as a whole we looked at the terror we were causing in the middle east was far worse than a couple planes flying into a few buildings. In reaction, we blew up schools with innocent children, we tortured innocent muslims, we turned half the world into racists, we literally declined in progressive understanding 100 years. But this is the standard practice and mindset which is totally acceptable in todays world. A problem occurs - and we react. That is common sense. And by common I mean it is commonly used I don't mean it in a complimentary manner. Common sense, is actually sometimes quite silly.
Some analysists suggest that the war in the middle east, which was a reaction to 9/11 (which by the way was probably a reaction to something else) is now the reason why the world is in a global recession. That there was war going on around the main source of oil on the planet meant the prices lifted dramatically and kept lifting. So the American presence overseas was supposed to lower the levels of fear of terrorists by wiping them out, in reality by going to war against them brought the fear directly into the home of every single person on the planet more or less by making the problem real for everybody in that it was no longer a drama available just on the TV - now it was in the workplace and metaphorically we saw people dying all around us who lost their jobs and their houses came crushing down not to rubble, but to receipts as the banks forclosed on them. Now every person who has worked hard for something or is trying to make their business survive or put their children through school is concerned that there isn't going to be enough money all of which has sent the world into a state of more panic. Which means what? More reaction and more bad decisions and more bugs in the program and more stuff to fix and more needing to look outside for some miracle solution.
Since all of this happened, we have seen more and more people get onto the bandwagon of conspiracy theories. Pre-9/11 it was still a very fringe idea to be talking about the Global Bank empires out to rule the world - now it is almost dinner conversation. Another example is pre bird and swine flu. Before those out breaks, the old trustworthy drug industry was the night and shining armor to the masses. But now?

